The Law

 Fox hunting remains unpopular in the UK, with 80% of people believing it should remain illegal. However, it can be difficult to prove that the law has been broken, and the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has been reluctant to take cases to court. 

It took Labour 8 years of leading government to create this law. It has existed since 2004. That's 20 years.

In those 20 years the laws on peaceful protest, in the UK - a liberal democracy, have become much harsher.


This means that everybody has a right to a peaceful protest and no restrictions shall be placed on this unless it is in the interests of national security, public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime or for the protection of health.


So is fox hunting

- effecting national security

- likely to cause disorder or Crime

- likely to effect health of someone


It is a crime therefore it is likely to?

However, Is it a priority? when allocating police force tasks - it seems not.

This process can be used to allocate police resources for any possible crime prevention.

The recent allocation, deployment, of armed officers resulting in the death, by shooting, of an individual deemed to be a threat to life is both a tradegy and a crime already referred to police complaints.

The individual allegedly brandishing a knife should be of concern probably for themselves. 

The outcome of this investigation will be worth following.

Also no one, as far as I am aware, has suggested that the police, or the armed officer, should be avenged for alleged killing another human being.

This is a serious ethical and moral question in one of the worlds leading democracies.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BYU Blog 13

BYU Blog 11

Restoring French Chateaux